FAIR SHARE
Monitor 2025
What role can data play in advancing the social impact sector’s commitment to gender equity?
This year, we publish the 7th edition of the FAIR SHARE Monitor at a time when the global civil society sector faces immense threats, ranging from funding cuts and the rise of anti-rights movements to various political crises. These challenges undeniably impact organisations’ participation in the Monitor. Yet, they also serve as a stark reminder that driving meaningful change in our sector requires prioritising intersectional gender equity (and leveraging data to that end!), even in turbulent times.
So, has the social impact sector made any strides towards gender equity since it was last monitored? Explore our findings below to learn more.


About the FAIR SHARE Monitor
The FAIR SHARE Monitor is a data-based tool that measures and tracks gender equity in leadership within the international social impact sector. Using data sourced from organisations or gathered through our research, we ranking organisations based on the proportion of women in their leadership. The progress, stagnation or regress of each organisation is measured and made transparent from year to year – making the FAIR SHARE Monitor a tool with which both individual organisations and the sector can hold themselves accountable to gender equity.
Overview of the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025
Understanding the data collection process
For the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025, social impact organisations from around the world were invited to participate in data collection. In total, 106 organisations working in various sectors including healthcare, human rights, climate & the environment, children & youth, international cooperation and more, were invited to participate. These organisations were invited to share data on the gender composition of their staff and leadership teams, as well as general information about their internal organisational culture, though an online survey.
When organisations do not respond to our data collection requests, we proactively research the necessary information from their websites and other public platforms. When exact numbers aren’t available, we assume a 70% proportion of women on staff. The researched data is then shared with the respective organisation, giving them an opportunity confirm or amend the data as needed.
When data isn’t confirmed by organisations, we publish the researched findings and differentiate, in our Monitor publication, between organisations who actively participated in data collection through either data submission or data confirmation, and those who did not respond to any of our data inquiries. When we are unable to find sufficient gender data on organisations through research, the organisations are removed from the Monitor analysis and final results publication.
This year, while 8 new international organisations were added since the last Monitor, 15 other organisations had to be removed from the final data analysis for various reasons. These reasons include unavailability of sufficient gender data on public platforms, limited staff capacities due to ongoing crises in the sector (such as the USAID funding freeze, attacks on DEI, and growing anti-rights movements worldwide to name a few), resulting in competing priorities for organisations.
Ultimately, 91 international organisations have been included in the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025, representing an estimated staff size of over 266,000 employees.

Key data points of the FAIR SHARE Monitor
To measure women’s representation in social impact organisations and gain a deeper understanding of their internal culture, we collect data on the gender composition across various organisational levels as well as general information about their internal structure and culture. Similar to previous editions, the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025 includes the following data:
- Overall Staff gender distribution (women, men, non-binary)
- Middle Management gender distribution
- Senior Management Team gender distribution
- Board gender distribution
- Representation of BIWOC in staff, Senior Management Team and Board
- Organisation’s scope of work
- Internal Diversity, Equity and Inclusion mechanisms
- Outcomes from past Monitor results if applicable.
Gender data transparency in the face of sector-wide threats
For this 7th edition of the FAIR SHARE Monitor, out of 91 international organisations included in data analysis, 40 organisations actively participated in data collection, accounting for a 44% participation rate. Most organisations acknowledged the importance of gender data transparency in advancing gender-equitable leadership, with 63% citing transparency as a major reason for participation.
However, while the previous Monitor recorded the highest number of actively participating organisations in its history, the current edition has seen a slight decline. This decrease in participation can be partly attributed to the various challenges the sector continues to face amidst rising anti-rights movements around the world. But the question remains: how can the social impact sector navigate these challenges while remaining committed to shedding light on and addressing gender gaps within its internal structures?
Gender equity: The unmoved needle of our sector
Who makes up the social impact sector?
Six years since we started collecting gender data on the social impact sector, what changes have we observed towards equitable gender representation?
With women representing 65% of the sector’s staff and 51% of its leadership in the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025, it is evident that the social impact sector still has a long way to go to achieve equitable leadership representation. Additionally, men in the sector are twice as likely to reach leadership positions compared to women, maintaining a comparative advantage of 2.0, consistent with trends from previous Monitors. This persistent disparity raises a crucial question: is the fate of women in the social impact sector sealed?


To better understand women’s leadership journey in the sector, we looked into 29 organisations with Middle Management in their internal structures. This analysis revealed trends consistent with the previous Monitor: in the sector, women and men progress in opposing directions. While it is worth noting that, on average, in organisations with a middle management structure, women represent the majority at all levels – 57% of staff, 57% of middle management, and 54% of senior leadership – it is also important to recognise that when contrasted with data on men’s representation, a notable gap persist. Indeed, women’s representation steadily declines as they move up the organisational ladder, while men’s representation increases.

Who leads the social impact sector?
Given the FAIR SHARE Monitor’s focus on women’s leadership, a key part of data collection involves measuring the proportion of women in high decision-making spaces, specifically at the Senior Management and Board levels. This includes tracking the number of women who hold positions such as CEO or Executive Director in Senior Management Teams, and Chair in organisations’ Boards.
In the Monitor 2025, women make up 56% of all Senior Management teams on average, with most senior management teams (53%) having more than half of their teams made up of women.
However, in a surprising turn of events, the proportion of organisations with women CEOs or Executive Directors fell to 45%, a significant dip from the Monitor 2024 where women-led organisations represented 52% of all monitored organisations, and the lowest since the Monitor 2021.
At the Board level, Monitor 2025 findings remain consistent with previous Monitors, with women making up 49% of monitored Boards on average. And though 51% of all monitored organisations were recorded to have women chairs in their boards, most boards remain dominated by men, with 52% of boards having a majority of men members.

What advancements for women’s leadership?
A key element of the FAIR SHARE Monitor is ranking organisations based on how fairly women are represented in their leadership using the FAIR SHARE Index. The FAIR SHARE Index highlights the gap between the proportion of women in staff positions and the proportion of women in leadership roles. Organisations are considered to have a FAIR representation of women in leadership when their FAIR SHARE Index of 15.0 or lower.
For the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025, the average FAIR SHARE Index for all 91 monitored organisations is 20.31, indicating that the sector still has a long way to go to achieve gender-equitable leadership. In fact, the current index is not only significantly higher than the ideal index value, but it also marks a notable increase from the last Monitor’s index of 19.92, the lowest since we started monitoring the sector. This illustrates how fragile progress can be in a constantly shifting landscape and serves as a stark reminder that our efforts towards gender equity must never cease.

Gender equity across different organisation sizes
But how does the Monitor 2025 FAIR SHARE Index vary when organisations are categorised by size clusters?
In this Monitor edition, the majority of organisations are medium-sized (40%), with a staff size ranging from 101 and 1000 employees. Small and large organisations make up 27% and 33% of all monitored organisations, respectively. At first glance, it is evident that while each of the cluster has a FAIR SHARE Index well below the average Monitor 2025 Index of 20.31, none achieved a fair representation of women in leadership (index of 15 or lower).

Incidentally, when comparing clusters to their past Monitor performance, we observe a commendable decline in the index of medium-sized organisations, from 21.01 in the Monitor 2024 to 18.23 in the Monitor 2025, a significant progress for these organisations. For small and large organisation clusters, however, the surge in index value is rather disappointing, especially for small organisations which were closest to the ideal index value in the Monitor 2024 with a score of 15.21.
One step forward, two steps back?
Detailed findings reveal that, similar to the last Monitor, less than half of monitored organisations (47%) have a FAIR representation of women in leadership. In most organisations (53%), men are twice as likely to reach leadership positions compared to women.
Since the last Monitor, 7 organisations have successfully lowered their individual FAIR SHARE Index below the 15.0 threshold, achieving a fair representation of women in leadership. Conversely, 6 organisations have lost their fair representation of women in leadership.
Generally, we observe that 34% of monitored organisations improved their women’s leadership representation since they were last monitored. This progress is measured by a decrease of at least 10% in their FAIR SHARE Index, bringing them closer to the ideal threshold.
On the other hand, the proportion of organisations with a significant increase in their index value (regress) is at a high 41%. This marks yet another increase from the previous Monitor and is the highest in the last three years, illustrating a concerning trend in our sector.
16% of monitored organisations recorded no significant change in their FAIR SHARE Index while 9% of organisations were monitored for the first time.
Where are BIWOC leaders?
In 2021, the FAIR SHARE Monitor started tracking the representation of Black, Brown, Indigenous women and women of colour (BIWOC) in the leadership of the social impact sector. Since then, findings on BIWOC leaders have been consistent throughout the years: BIWOC leaders are systematically underrepresented in the social impact sector.
Aside from the fact that many organisations still do not collect data on the race make-up of their staff, even fewer organisations have data available on their Boards members. For this Monitor edition, only 44% of monitored organisations have data available on their BIWOC boards members.

In the Monitor 2025, 54% of organisations were reported to have race data on both staff and Board members, making it possible to draw conclusions, though limited, on the representation of BIWOC leaders in their structure. For this sub-group of monitored organisations, women, on average, made up 65% of staff against 54% in leadership.
When examining specific leadership positions, findings show that while women, all races confounded, hold 52% of all leadership roles, BIWOC occupy just about 19% of these positions. In the context of women’s leadership, this translates to BIWOC holding 37% of women leadership roles, which is consistent with the last Monitor where this figure was 36%.
This persistent underrepresentation of BIWOC leaders in our sector is further illustrated by the fact that only 35% of women-led organisations have a BIWOC CEO or Executive Director. For organisations with BIWOC data on Board members, 38% of women-led boards have a BIWOC Chair.
For the sector, the availability of this data, though incomplete, is welcomed. However, the consistent underrepresentation of BIWOC leaders calls for organisations and the sector as a whole to be more intentional about addressing the root causes of this disparity. To truly embody the principles of diversity, equity and inclusion that are so prominently promoted in their external work, organisations must take deliberate actions to rectify this imbalance.
Commitment to gender equity in action
In the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025, 28 international social impact organisations have signed the FAIR SHARE Commitment, a pledge to achieve gender equity in their leadership structure by 2030. These 28 committed organisations represent 31% of all monitored organisations and account for 60% of organisations who actively submitted data for the Monitor.
Beyond their historically consistent participation in the Monitor, committed organisations have also been leading the way in terms of equitable-gender representation in leadership. In the Monitor 2025, these organisations achieved an average FAIR SHARE Index of 10.33, a marking a record low compared to the last few years, and significantly below the 15.0 index threshold. Additionally, 75% of monitored committed organisations recorded a FAIR SHARE Index below 15.0, illustrating a fair representation of women in leadership.
Of course, there are still notable disparities between organisations even within committed organisations. For instance, 25% of committed organisations are yet to have a fair representation of women in leadership, and the highest Index in this sub-group is at a high 32.83, double the recommended index threshold. However, their overall performance illustrates that as a group, committed organisations are not only committed to achieving gender equity, but they are also actively working towards the goal of eliminating gender gaps in their leadership.

They have committed to gender equity

Organisations who have signed the FAIR SHARE Commitment
Sign the FAIR SHARE Commitment and join over 30 of your peers in their efforts to achieve gender equity in the sector by 2030.
FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025 Ranking
The social impact sector is doing remarkable work to foster equity and justice, but this ambition is not always evident in international organisations internal leadership structures and cultures. By annually measuring the representation of women in the sector and making transparent where organisations are in their journey towards gender equity, the FAIR SHARE Monitor aims to increase accountability and foster change to achieve this goal.
For the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025, international organisations from the social impact sector have an average FAIR SHARE Index of 20.31. This average, considerably higher than the index treshold, reaffirms the gender representation gaps the FAIR SHARE Monitor has been highlighting over the past years.
Our hope is that the findings below can be a starting point for organisational and sector-wide reflections to address gender gaps within the social impact sector and collectively work towards gender equity.

Data on 91 international organisations
For the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025, 91 international were ranked based on the data we collected. Together, their average FAIR SHARE Index is 20.31.
Organisations with a FAIR representation of women in leadership are highlighted in green and organisations who don’t are highlighted in red.
Symbols Key
✅ Active participation in Monitor
✳️ Committed organisation
⚠️ No data confirmation. Women staff estimated using women proportion from past Monitors or using 70% if organisation never submitted data to Monitor
⛔ Organisation has unsubscribed from Monitor mailing list.
↗ 10% decrease in Fair Share Index since last monitored year (Progress)
↘ 10% increase in Fair Share Index since last monitored year (Regress)
→ No significant change in FAIR SHARE since last monitored year
+ Organisation newly added to the Monitor
Organisation Size Key
- S: 1 – 100 employees
- M: 101 –1000 employees
- L: 1000+ employees
Rank | Organisation | Size | Women on staff | Women in leadership | Proportion of BIWOC in women leadership | FAIR SHARE Index 2025 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Greenpeace International ✅ | Large | 53% | 53% | N/A | 0.12 ↗ |
2 | Humanity United ✅ | Small | 73% | 73% | 45% | 0.16 ↗ |
3 | CIVICUS ✳️ ✅ | Small | 67% | 71% | 17% | 1.61 ↗ |
4 | Worldwide Initiatives for Grantmaker Support ⚠️ | Small | 67% | 65% | 36% | 1.96 ↗ |
5 | Christian Aid ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 54% | 57% | 44% | 1.97 ↗ |
6 | Skateistan ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 50% | 56% | 56% | 2.88 ↗ |
7 | 350.org ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 62% | 69% | 56% | 3.48 ↘ |
8 | Cuso International ✅ | Medium | 58% | 65% | 46% | 3.51 ↗ |
9 | Oxfam International ✳️ ⚠️ | Medium | 56% | 56% | 33% | 3.58 ↗ |
10 | Restless Development ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 52% | 59% | 42% | 3.61 ↘ |
11 | ActionAid International ✅ | Large | 46% | 52% | N/A | 3.82 ↘ |
12 | HelpAge International ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 53% | 61% | 57% | 4.08 ↗ |
13 | CARE International ✳️ ✅ | Large | 45% | 49% | N/A | 4.14 ↗ |
14 | WeMove Europe ✳️ ✅ | Small | 67% | 75% | N/A | 4.17 ↘ |
15 | International Committee of the Red Cross ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 65% | N/A | 4.78 ↗ |
16 | Sightsavers International ✅ | Medium | 50% | 47% | 27% | 4.98 ↘ |
17 | Children Rights International Network (CRIN) ✳️ ⚠️ | Small | 69% | 64% | N/A | 5.11 ↘ |
18 | Partners in Health ✅ | Large | 52% | 48% | N/A | 5.18 ↘ |
19 | Pathfinder International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 64% | 72% | 5.71 ↗ |
20 | Habitat for Humanity International ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 67% | 61% | 40% | 5.89 ↗ |
21 | VSO ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 49% | 61% | 43% | 5.97 ↘ |
22 | Frontline Aids ✳️ ⚠️ | Small | 59% | 73% | N/A | 7.04 ↘ |
23 | Girls Not Brides - The Partnership to End Child Marriage ✳️ ✅ | Small | 69% | 83% | 50% | 7.05 ↘ |
24 | Plan International ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 65% | 57% | N/A | 7.45 → |
25 | European Environmental Bureau ✅ | Small | 64% | 56% | N/A | 7.75 ↘ |
26 | Fistula Foundation ⚠️ | Small | 65% | 82% | 33% | 8.22 + |
27 | Caplor Horizons ✳️ ✅ | Small | 50% | 67% | 38% | 8.33 ↗ |
27 | International Child Development Initiatives (ICDI) ✳️ ✅ | Small | 83% | 75% | N/A | 8.33 ↗ |
28 | Hivos International ✅ | Medium | 68% | 59% | N/A | 9.64 ↘ |
29 | Article 19 ✳️ ✅ | Small | 71% | 61% | N/A | 9.82 ↗ |
30 | Heifer International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 60% | 38% | 10.0 → |
31 | Global Witness ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 64% | 56% | 11% | 10.35 ↗ |
32 | Near East Foundation ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 39% | 43% | 50% | 10.47 + |
33 | ChildFund International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 59% | 21% | 10.62 ↗ |
34 | Hagar International ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 59% | 38% | 10.91 + |
35 | Wikimedia Foundation ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 58% | 27% | 12.11 → |
36 | Sierra Club ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 59% | N/A | 12.49 → |
37 | Landesa ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 57% | 50% | 12.86 ↘ |
38 | The Global Fund ✅ | Large | 60% | 49% | N/A | 13.08 ↘ |
39 | Ashoka ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 60% | 50% | 13.33 ↘ |
39 | Global Fund for Community Foundations ✅ | Small | 80% | 67% | 67% | 13.33 ↗ |
40 | The B Team ✳️ ✅ | Small | 87% | 73% | N/A | 13.94 ↘ |
41 | The Nature Conservancy ⚠️ | Large | 57% | 46% | 25% | 14.62 ↘ |
42 | Search for Common Ground ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 55% | 18% | 15.16 ↗ |
43 | Norwegian Refugee Council ✳️ ✅ | Large | 39% | 63% | N/A | 15.79 ↘ |
44 | World Neighbors ⚠️ | Small | 70% | 57% | 8% | 15.86 ↗ |
45 | One Acre Fund ✳️ ✅ | Large | 45% | 39% | 73% | 15.91 → |
46 | The Hunger Project ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 53% | 50% | 16.67 ↗ |
47 | Danish Refugee Council ✅ | Large | 39% | 35% | N/A | 17.53 ↘ |
48 | Human Rights Watch ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 52% | 18% | 18.38 ↘ |
49 | United Methodist Committee on Relief (UMCOR) ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 51% | 12% | 19.47 ↘ |
50 | Americares ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 52% | N/A | 19.94 → |
51 | Church World Services ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 52% | N/A | 20.21 ↗ |
52 | Room to Read ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 52% | 8% | 20.63 ↘ |
53 | International Medical Corps ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 50% | N/A | 21.52 + |
54 | Transparency International ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 61% | 43% | N/A | 22.25 ↗ |
55 | Global Giving ⚠️ | Small | 74% | 56% | 44% | 22.62 ↘ |
56 | World Resources Institute ✅ | Large | 57% | 40% | N/A | 23.15 ↘ |
57 | Pact ✳️ ✅ | Small | 70% | 50% | 25% | 23.33 ↘ |
57 | Zakat Foundation of America ⚠️ | Small | 70% | 50% | 100% | 23.33 ↗ |
58 | Action on Disability and Development (ADD International) ⚠️ | Small | 70% | 47% | 63% | 24.46 ↗ |
59 | AMREF Health Africa ✳️ ✅ | Large | 41% | 31% | N/A | 24.52 ↘ |
60 | Terre des hommes International Federation ✅ | Small | 100% | 75% | N/A | 25.0 ↘ |
61 | WWF International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 47% | 22% | 25.05 ↘ |
62 | Democracy Reporting International ✳️ ✅ | Small | 54% | 38% | N/A | 25.41 ↘ |
63 | The Taskforce for Global Health ⛔ | Medium | 70% | 50% | 30% | 25.56 ↗ |
64 | HealthRight International ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 47% | 50% | 25.96 ↗ |
65 | Direct Relief ⚠️ | Medium | 55% | 35% | N/A | 29.76 ↘ |
66 | Nutrition International ✅ | Medium | 70% | 42% | 63% | 32.22 + |
67 | International Rescue Committee ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 43% | N/A | 32.62 ↗ |
68 | ONE ✳️ ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 44% | 50% | 32.83 → |
69 | Lutheran World Relief ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 42% | 38% | 33.39 ↘ |
70 | Handicap International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 41% | N/A | 33.85 → |
71 | The Carter Center ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 41% | N/A | 34.03 + |
72 | World Jewish Relief ⚠️ | Small | 82% | 52% | N/A | 35.52 + |
73 | Reporters Without Borders ⚠️ | Small | 70% | 39% | N/A | 36.77 → |
74 | CBM Christoffel-Blindenmission Christian Blind Mission e.V. ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 39% | N/A | 38.52 ↗ |
75 | Islamic Relief Worldwide ✅ | Medium | 36% | 23% | N/A | 38.64 → |
76 | SOS Children's Villages International ✅ | Large | 66% | 37% | N/A | 38.96 → |
77 | Brother's Brother Foundation ⚠️ | Small | 50% | 27% | N/A | 38.99 + |
78 | World Vision International ⛔ | Large | 70% | 38% | 50% | 40.83 ↘ |
79 | MAP International ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 37% | 9% | 42.16 → |
80 | Project HOPE ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 37% | N/A | 42.38 ↘ |
81 | Compassion International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 33% | N/A | 45.32 → |
82 | Conservation International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 31% | N/A | 47.56 → |
83 | ACTED ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 29% | N/A | 54.57 → |
84 | Save the Children International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 31% | N/A | 55.13 ↘ |
85 | World Central Kitchen ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 29% | N/A | 55.71 ↘ |
86 | Catholic Relief Services ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 25% | 13% | 57.38 ↘ |
87 | Action Against Hunger International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 25% | 17% | 63.77 ↘ |
88 | AmfAR (Foundation for AIDS Research) ⚠️ | Small | 70% | 19% | 17% | 71.38 ↗ |
Small organisations ranking
Below is a ranking of 25 small organisations that were included in the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025. Together, their average FAIR SHARE Index is 17.58.
Organisations with a FAIR representation of women in leadership are highlighted in green and organisations who don’t are highlighted in red.
While small organisations have the lowest FAIR SHARE Index among all clusters, they are still far from a fair representation of women in leadership. Indeed, with a comparative advantage of 1.6, men are 1.6 times more likely to attain a leadership position than women.
Symbols Key
✅ Active participation in Monitor
✳️ Committed organisation
⚠️ No data confirmation. Women staff estimated using women proportion from past Monitors or using 70% if organisation never submitted data to Monitor
⛔ Organisation has unsubscribed from Monitor mailing list.
↗ 10% decrease in Fair Share Index since last monitored year (Progress)
↘ 10% increase in Fair Share Index since last monitored year (Regress)
→ No significant change in FAIR SHARE since last monitored year
+ Organisation newly added to the Monitor
Organisation Size Key
- S: 1 – 100 employees
- M: 101 –1000 employees
- L: 1000+ employees
Rank | Organisation | Size | Women on staff | Women in leadership | Proportion of BIWOC in Women Leadership | FAIR SHARE Index 2025 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Humanity United ✅ | Small | 73% | 73% | 45% | 0.16 ↗ |
2 | CIVICUS ✳️ ✅ | Small | 67% | 71% | 17% | 1.61 ↗ |
3 | Worldwide Initiatives for Grantmaker Support ⚠️ | Small | 67% | 65% | 36% | 1.96 ↗ |
4 | WeMove Europe ✳️ ✅ | Small | 67% | 75% | N/A | 4.17 ↘ |
5 | Children Rights International Network (CRIN) ✳️ ⚠️ | Small | 69% | 64% | N/A | 5.11 ↘ |
6 | Frontline Aids ✳️ ⚠️ | Small | 59% | 73% | N/A | 7.04 ↘ |
7 | Girls Not Brides - The Partnership to End Child Marriage ✳️ ✅ | Small | 69% | 83% | 50% | 7.05 ↘ |
8 | European Environmental Bureau ✅ | Small | 64% | 56% | N/A | 7.75 ↘ |
9 | Fistula Foundation ⚠️ | Small | 65% | 82% | 33% | 8.22 + |
10 | Caplor Horizons ✳️ ✅ | Small | 50% | 67% | 38% | 8.33 ↗ |
10 | International Child Development Initiatives (ICDI) ✳️ ✅ | Small | 83% | 75% | N/A | 8.33 ↗ |
11 | Article 19 ✳️ ✅ | Small | 71% | 61% | N/A | 9.82 ↗ |
12 | Global Fund for Community Foundations ✅ | Small | 80% | 67% | 67% | 13.33 ↗ |
13 | The B Team ✳️ ✅ | Small | 87% | 73% | N/A | 13.94 ↘ |
14 | World Neighbors ⚠️ | Small | 70% | 57% | 8% | 15.86 ↗ |
15 | Global Giving ⚠️ | Small | 74% | 56% | 44% | 22.62 ↘ |
16 | Pact ✳️ ✅ | Small | 70% | 50% | 25% | 23.33 ↘ |
16 | Zakat Foundation of America ⚠️ | Small | 70% | 50% | 100% | 23.33 ↗ |
17 | Action on Disability and Development (ADD International) ⚠️ | Small | 70% | 47% | 63% | 24.46 ↗ |
18 | Terre des hommes International Federation ✅ | Small | 100% | 75% | N/A | 25.0 ↘ |
19 | Democracy Reporting International ✳️ ✅ | Small | 54% | 38% | N/A | 25.41 ↘ |
20 | World Jewish Relief ⚠️ | Small | 82% | 52% | N/A | 35.52 + |
21 | Reporters Without Borders ⚠️ | Small | 70% | 39% | N/A | 36.77 → |
22 | Brother's Brother Foundation ⚠️ | Small | 50% | 27% | N/A | 38.99 + |
23 | AmfAR (Foundation for AIDS Research) ⚠️ | Small | 70% | 19% | 17% | 71.38 ↗ |
Medium organisations ranking
Below is a ranking of 36 medium-sized organisations that were included in the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025. Together, their average FAIR SHARE Index is 18.23.
Organisations with a FAIR representation of women in leadership are highlighted in green and organisations who don’t are highlighted in red.
As the largest cluster, medium organisations present a comparative advantage of 1.9, with men having 1.9 times more chances of attaining a leadership position than women. Although this still falls short of fair representation, medium organisations have made significant progress compared to the last Monitor. Indeed, half of all medium organisations now have a fair share of women leaders.
Symbols Key
✅ Active participation in Monitor
✳️ Committed organisation
⚠️ No data confirmation. Women staff estimated using women proportion from past Monitors or using 70% if organisation never submitted data to Monitor
⛔ Organisation has unsubscribed from Monitor mailing list.
↗ 10% decrease in Fair Share Index since last monitored year (Progress)
↘ 10% increase in Fair Share Index since last monitored year (Regress)
→ No significant change in FAIR SHARE since last monitored year
+ Organisation newly added to the Monitor
Organisation Size Key
- S: 1 – 100 employees
- M: 101 –1000 employees
- L: 1000+ employees
Rank | Organisation | Size | Women on staff | Women in leadership | Proportion of BIWOC in Women Leadership | FAIR SHARE Index 2025 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Christian Aid ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 54% | 57% | 44% | 1.97 ↗ |
2 | Skateistan ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 50% | 56% | 56% | 2.88 ↗ |
3 | 350.org ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 62% | 69% | 56% | 3.48 ↘ |
4 | Cuso International ✅ | Medium | 58% | 65% | 46% | 3.51 ↗ |
5 | Oxfam International ✳️ ⚠️ | Medium | 56% | 56% | 33% | 3.58 ↗ |
6 | Restless Development ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 52% | 59% | 42% | 3.61 ↘ |
7 | HelpAge International ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 53% | 61% | 57% | 4.08 ↗ |
8 | Sightsavers International ✅ | Medium | 50% | 47% | 27% | 4.98 ↘ |
9 | Habitat for Humanity International ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 67% | 61% | 40% | 5.89 ↗ |
10 | VSO ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 49% | 61% | 43% | 5.97 ↘ |
11 | Plan International ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 65% | 57% | N/A | 7.45 → |
12 | Hivos International ✅ | Medium | 68% | 59% | N/A | 9.64 ↘ |
13 | Global Witness ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 64% | 56% | 11% | 10.35 ↗ |
14 | Near East Foundation ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 39% | 43% | 50% | 10.47 + |
15 | Hagar International ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 59% | 38% | 10.91 + |
16 | Wikimedia Foundation ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 58% | 27% | 12.11 → |
17 | Landesa ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 57% | 50% | 12.86 ↘ |
18 | Ashoka ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 60% | 50% | 13.33 ↘ |
19 | Search for Common Ground ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 55% | 18% | 15.16 ↗ |
20 | The Hunger Project ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 53% | 50% | 16.67 ↗ |
21 | Human Rights Watch ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 52% | 18% | 18.38 ↘ |
22 | United Methodist Committee on Relief (UMCOR) ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 51% | 12% | 19.47 ↘ |
23 | Americares ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 52% | N/A | 19.94 → |
24 | Church World Services ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 52% | N/A | 20.21 ↗ |
25 | Transparency International ✳️ ✅ | Medium | 61% | 43% | N/A | 22.25 ↗ |
26 | The Taskforce for Global Health ⛔ | Medium | 70% | 50% | 30% | 25.56 ↗ |
27 | HealthRight International ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 47% | 50% | 25.96 ↗ |
28 | Direct Relief ⚠️ | Medium | 55% | 35% | N/A | 29.76 ↘ |
29 | Nutrition International ✅ | Medium | 70% | 42% | 63% | 32.22 + |
30 | ONE ✳️ ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 44% | 50% | 32.83 → |
31 | Lutheran World Relief ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 42% | 38% | 33.39 ↘ |
32 | CBM Christoffel-Blindenmission Christian Blind Mission e.V. ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 39% | N/A | 38.52 ↗ |
33 | Islamic Relief Worldwide ✅ | Medium | 36% | 23% | N/A | 38.64 → |
34 | MAP International ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 37% | 9% | 42.16 → |
35 | Project HOPE ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 37% | N/A | 42.38 ↘ |
36 | World Central Kitchen ⚠️ | Medium | 70% | 29% | N/A | 55.71 ↘ |
Large organisations ranking
Below is a ranking of 30 large organisations that were included in the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025. Together, their average FAIR SHARE Index is 25.09.
Organisations with a FAIR representation of women in leadership are highlighted in green and organisations who don’t are highlighted in red.
With the highest cluster index, large organisations have an index significantly above the average monitor index, highlighting the persisting challenge large organisations face in achieving a fair representation of women in their leadership.
Symbols Key
✅ Active participation in Monitor
✳️ Committed organisation
⚠️ No data confirmation. Women staff estimated using women proportion from past Monitors or using 70% if organisation never submitted data to Monitor
⛔ Organisation has unsubscribed from Monitor mailing list.
↗ 10% decrease in Fair Share Index since last monitored year (Progress)
↘ 10% increase in Fair Share Index since last monitored year (Regress)
→ No significant change in FAIR SHARE since last monitored year
+ Organisation newly added to the Monitor
Organisation Size Key
- S: 1 – 100 employees
- M: 101 –1000 employees
- L: 1000+ employees
Rank | Organisation | Size | Women on staff | Women in leadership | Proportion of BIWOC in Women Leadership | FAIR SHARE Index 2025 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Greenpeace International ✅ | Large | 53% | 53% | N/A | 0.12 ↗ |
2 | ActionAid International ✅ | Large | 46% | 52% | N/A | 3.82 ↘ |
3 | CARE International ✳️ ✅ | Large | 45% | 49% | N/A | 4.14 ↗ |
4 | International Committee of the Red Cross ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 65% | N/A | 4.78 ↗ |
5 | Partners in Health ✅ | Large | 52% | 48% | N/A | 5.18 ↘ |
6 | Pathfinder International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 64% | 72% | 5.71 ↗ |
7 | Heifer International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 60% | 38% | 10.0 → |
8 | ChildFund International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 59% | 21% | 10.62 ↗ |
9 | Sierra Club ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 59% | N/A | 12.49 → |
10 | The Global Fund ✅ | Large | 60% | 49% | N/A | 13.08 ↘ |
11 | The Nature Conservancy ⚠️ | Large | 57% | 46% | 25% | 14.62 ↘ |
12 | Norwegian Refugee Council ✳️ ✅ | Large | 39% | 63% | N/A | 15.79 ↘ |
13 | One Acre Fund ✳️ ✅ | Large | 45% | 39% | 73% | 15.91 → |
14 | Danish Refugee Council ✅ | Large | 39% | 35% | N/A | 17.53 ↘ |
15 | Room to Read ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 52% | 8% | 20.63 ↘ |
16 | International Medical Corps ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 50% | N/A | 21.52 + |
17 | World Resources Institute ✅ | Large | 57% | 40% | N/A | 23.15 ↘ |
18 | AMREF Health Africa ✳️ ✅ | Large | 41% | 31% | N/A | 24.52 ↘ |
19 | WWF International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 47% | 22% | 25.05 ↘ |
20 | International Rescue Committee ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 43% | N/A | 32.62 ↗ |
21 | Handicap International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 41% | N/A | 33.85 → |
22 | The Carter Center ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 41% | N/A | 34.03 + |
23 | SOS Children's Villages International ✅ | Large | 66% | 37% | N/A | 38.96 → |
24 | World Vision International ⛔ | Large | 70% | 38% | 50% | 40.83 ↘ |
25 | Compassion International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 33% | N/A | 45.32 → |
26 | Conservation International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 31% | N/A | 47.56 → |
27 | ACTED ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 29% | N/A | 54.57 → |
28 | Save the Children International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 31% | N/A | 55.13 ↘ |
29 | Catholic Relief Services ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 25% | 13% | 57.38 ↘ |
30 | Action Against Hunger International ⚠️ | Large | 70% | 25% | 17% | 63.77 ↘ |
Your feedback is important to us!
Did you find the FAIR SHARE Monitor 2025 insightful? Any concerns or suggestions you would like to share with us? Send your feedback in the contact form below or email us directly: monitor@fairsharewl.org. We look forward to hearing from you!
